Results can be saved for future use as well. The test can also show how speeds compare to others in your city, the world average, the U.S. Choose what you are interested in, and the test will automatically run - then, it’ll provide you with detailed charts on exactly how you performed. You will have options for testing download, upload, combined, or just latency when you first begin.
#Speakeasy internet speed test series
If you’re looking for a test that offers more data than the average speed test, runs a series of examinations and provides useful comparison data. The site does require you to accept cookies before beginning, but some of our other picks do not. It’s not only the prettiest speed test around, but it also provides the best data and features for a single visit. All files are downloaded and uploaded in sequence - rather than simultaneously - to imitate real internet browsing conditions. Rather than selecting a location, the website calculates the quickest and most reliable server from 127 available servers. You also have a history section to easily compare your tests to chart changes and a share section to share on Facebook or Twitter. The test tracks real-time info on downloads, uploads, latency, and other info like your IP address, server location, and more.
#Speakeasy internet speed test download
SpeedOf.Me is an HTML5-based speed test that’s lightweight and designed to replicate real-world browsing and downloading conditions - it does so by requesting a series of files of increasing sizes and recording the download speed. I'd definitely make sure there isn't some cheap linksys on his network when he's testing and you might check the arp table on your device just to make sure he's not lying. I've found that most off the shelf consumer routers are not able to handle FE speeds and occasionally the OS itself won't be able to consistently gain those speeds. Lastly, I work for a different provider now and 100Mb/s is the lowest speed we offer to customers so I do see similar issues quite often. You may also look into setting up a mini test server as well. To eliminate the possible bottleneck issues along the network path I would recommend setting up an FTP server on your network as close to the customer as possible to verify the speeds. Overhead always plays a factor in reduced speed results as well but in this case that does not sound like the problem since he's experiencing fluctuations and not consistently lower speeds. System limitations aside, this is especially true with dealing with higher speeds such as 100M up and down since the bottleneck may exist at any hop in between the user and the test site. In my experience the faster the connection speed is the less accurate the flash based tests are. An old fashioned FTP test is often a better way to go but not nearly as convenient for most users. Since the speedtests use a flash based app that also adds possible slowness with flash, browser, etc.
(Testing stuff like this in the middle of the night often provides more accurate results than during business hours) I'd recommend going with the Ookla tests over the Speakeasy hosted also since you have options of which server to test to on diverse networks rather than a single POP location on the Speakeasy/Megapath/Covad network on a system that could be over utilized when you're testing. Ookla (started by the founder of Speakeasy) is much more accurate since it attempts to locate your closest speedtest based on ping times and other factors. Obviously those extra hops or changes in the network can impact speeds. Speakeasy merged with Covad and Megapath last year and with their network changes the number of hops or path to the speedtests are very different than they previously were. Having worked for Speakeasy from 2005-2011 I can say based on experience that there are several factors that cause slow or inconsistent speed test results using the Speakeasy or Ookla speedtest.
0 kommentar(er)
